Glasgow City Council pauses plan to fire and rehire 23,000 staff

This post was originally published on this site.

Glasgow City Council pauses plan to fire and rehire 23,000 staff

a group of workers protesting and waving purple 'Unison' flags outside an Glasgow City chambers.Image source, Getty Images
  • Published

Glasgow City Council has agreed to pause plans to fire and rehire more than 23,000 members of staff, the BBC has been told.

The decision follows online talks between the council and three trade unions, chaired by Deputy First Minister Jenny Gilruth.

It is understood that negotiations between the council and the GMB, Unison and Unite unions will resume early next week to try to reach a new deal on pay.

Letters which had been due to be sent to staff informing them of the fire and rehire plans will not be issued.

The SNP-led council had threatened to sack thousands of members of staff and then rehire them on new contracts after negotiations with unions over equal pay proposals broke down.

The talks were about the council’s plans to replace a pay system found to discriminate against mostly women workers. The changes would see the majority of staff unaffected or better off, but they would cut pay for 11% of staff.

Gilruth said the Scottish government did not support fire and rehire schemes and had urged the council and trade unions to get back around the negotiating table.

GMB organiser David Hume said the council had initially made the wrong decision – but welcomed its willingness to review and reverse it.

“After seven years of hard negotiations, we believe the new structure is ready to be put before our members. They should now be allowed to decide and that should be done as a matter of urgency,” he said.

One Glasgow City Council worker had earlier described the situation as “heartbreaking”.

Joanne, a support for learning worker from Glasgow, said the local authority “had a cheek to say they care about their employees” after she read the council’s message saying it was dismissing all staff.

She was told two weeks ago that she would be one of the workers facing a pay cut under the new system, leaving her “distraught”. She will lose about £300 per year.

She said: “I came away from my work crying – really, really upset. I couldn’t believe that after 25 years’ service to Glasgow City Council, I am getting let down yet again.”

She continued: “I am working with the most vulnerable children in society. I would put it to Glasgow City Council: please come and do my job for one day – one day only.

“It is so wrong, and I can’t afford to lose money.”

At a meeting last month, the council agreed to an overhaul of its pay and grading structure after eight years of negotiations.

The council has previously paid over £770m to 19,000 claimants after it emerged that female workers in roles such as catering or cleaning were paid less than those in male-dominated areas such as refuse collection.

The new system would see 63% of those affected gain financially, while 11% would have their wages reduced.

It was calculated after a job evaluation programme looked at each role within the local authority.

This saw staff being given questionnaires to fill out, and in some cases interviewed about their job.

Get in touch

Are you a Glasgow City Council employee? How have you been affected by the fire-and-rehire decision?

Each evaluation was based around 13 different factors. Categories included physical effort, mental skills, concentration and physical co-ordination.

The job evaluation then provided a score for each role within the council, with those scores used to establish which pay grade – out of a possible 12 – each job should sit in.

However, this has resulted in some roles being moved onto lower salaries than they were previously on, with the highest drop in wages expected to be around £11,500.

The council had said on Thursday that every member of non-teaching staff would be issued with a letter of dismissal, including chief executive Susanne Millar, nursery staff and refuse collectors. They would then be offered new contracts, set to begin on 1 January.

Changes to UK-wide employment law will come in effect on the same date.

These changes will make dismissing an employee for refusing to accept contract changes automatically an unfair dismissal.

‘We are willing to speak’

Talks between the council and the GMB, Unison and Unite unions fell apart on Wednesday when Unison said it would not ballot its members on a proposed new pay offer.

The council accused Unison of “betraying” members by not giving them the chance to vote on it, but the union’s education convener Sylvia Haughey accused the council of using “bullying tactics”.

She told told BBC Radio Scotland Breakfast “We haven’t betrayed anyone, we certainly haven’t betrayed our members. We are out fighting for our members.

“We are fighting for the members who are… losing big financial amounts, whether its £200 or £12,000.

“We have not walked away from anything. We are willing to speak to the council at any time.”

Glasgow City Council’s communications director, Colin Edgar, said it was a “hellish situation” that “almost no-one” wanted to be in.

He acknowledged that staff would feel distressed and anxious, but promised that all those affected would be rehired without a break in their continuity of service.

Edgar said the council did not want to be in this situation, but it was a consequence of fixing an unlawful pay scheme.

“Whenever any council does this exercise, there are people who gain and people who lose – in our case that’s about 11% of people who will earn less,” he said.

Both the GMB and Unite unions were in favour of balloting their members over the proposed pay structure, and said they had secured an extra £110m to be added into the salary structure.

However, Unison said the extra funding was for “assimilation and arrears”, and would not help the staff facing wage cuts.

The GMB and Unite unions had both criticised the original decision to go ahead with fire and re-hire, with Unite calling it a “scandalous threat”.

The UK government’s Scottish Secretary, Douglas Alexander, said had called for the council’s readers to “get back around the table” and find a better way forward.

Hot this week

Topics

spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img