Winter fuel cuts turned the Welsh against Labour, former leader Neil Kinnock says

This post was originally published on this site.

Winter fuel cuts turned the Welsh against Labour, former leader Neil Kinnock says

ByJacob Morris

Newyddion S4C
  • Published

Former Labour leader Neil Kinnock says the party’s welfare policies turned disillusionment with Labour in Wales into “active dislike”.

He said that UK government decisions on benefits and winter fuel payments had driven voters in Wales away from the Welsh arm of the party before the country’s Senedd election in May.

Lord Kinnock made the comments as part of a Newyddion S4C YouTube special on Andy Burnham’s first 100 days as Prime Minister.

Governing “at both ends of the M4” before Wales’ parliamentary elections had presented an extra challenge for his party, he said.

He said: “If there is any opposition or resentment to the government on either end of the M4, the other lot are going to pay as well.”

“There is no doubt in my mind,” he said, that “alienation… had been creeping up.”

“It could be a mixture of boredom. It could be a mixture of dislike,” Kinnock said.

He said “what turned that into active dislike” had been things “like the withdrawal of the winter fuel allowance, the threats to the welfare system” and not scrapping a cap on two child benefits quick enough.

In June last year, the Labour UK government U-turned on its controversial decision to means-test winter fuel payments for pensioners in England and Wales.

Almost one year later, Labour lost power in Wales in a seismic election in May, returning just nine Senedd members after running the Welsh government for 27 years.

Lord Kinnock, who is the father of Welsh Secretary Stephen Kinnock, also said he reservations about devolving justice to Wales – a key demand of the Plaid Cymru Welsh government.

Plaid ministers say it would allow for a more effective system tailored to Welsh communities and better integrated with health, housing and education.

Kinnock said there would no be “much of an argument” against the idea if it meant that “Wales was better protected, that the streets were safer” and “that the justice system was more efficient”.

“But those guarantees are absent at the moment,” he said.

“Until they exist, until they’re in place, the upheaval of creating what would have to be effectively a new system with new management… with an introverted view of the justice system – there would be more downsides than upsides.”

“Now that picture might change, but as I can see it now in October 2026, that’s where we are, there are more disadvantages than advantages.”

Hot this week

Dr. Brandice Allen: The Pediatric Dentist Building Care Around the Whole Family

Raised in Atlanta and educated at North Atlanta High...

Travis Bright on Building Smarter Homes Through Better Planning

Bright grew up in Greenville and developed an interest...

Andrew Dutil: Building a Career in Claims Consulting and Contract Administration

His background runs through civil engineering and the U.S....

Daniel Cornell on the Other Side of the Acquisition Table 

His career has included leading major banking practices, advising...

Jodie Kluver: From the Nonprofit Sector to Founding a Publishing House

She has been a core faculty member in the...

Topics

Travis Bright on Building Smarter Homes Through Better Planning

Bright grew up in Greenville and developed an interest...

Andrew Dutil: Building a Career in Claims Consulting and Contract Administration

His background runs through civil engineering and the U.S....

Daniel Cornell on the Other Side of the Acquisition Table 

His career has included leading major banking practices, advising...

First minister says Welsh spending powers takes step forward after Andy Burnham meeting

First minister says Welsh spending powers takes step forward...

Bridging Europe and Asia: How UK Fintech Sends Is Reshaping Cross-Border Payments

They require a comprehensive, reliable financial ecosystem. This is...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img