It’s hard to get Democrat and Republican politicians to agree on much at the moment, but the benefits of geothermal energy is one rare area of consensus.

Geothermal energy makes use of natural heat below the Earth’s surface and the next generation of technology can access hotter, deeper and more varied locations than ever before.

Broadly, the low greenhouse gas emissions of geothermal plants appeals to liberals, while conservatives like the additional energy independence of geothermal, plus the use of drilling technology familiar in the oil and gas industry.

Some US states are trying to accelerate permits for geothermal plants and in April senators from both parties introduced the Next-Generation Geothermal, external Research and Development Act.

The legislation would direct the Department of Energy to support the development and commercialisation of the next generation of geothermal energy systems.

One emerging type is known as enhanced geothermal systems (EGS).

In EGS, underground rock is fractured hydraulically. That’s done by pumping pressurised fluid into one well, and then collecting steam or hot water from another well.

Better known as fracking, this technique has become well known and controversial (particularly in the UK) in the oil and gas industry.

“It’s the same techniques and up to a point it’s the same industry as well,” sums up Gernot Wagner, a climate economist at Columbia Business School in New York. But “from a climate perspective, there’s a huge difference,” he adds.

For him, the risk of seismic activity, by creating cracks underground, is outweighed by the benefits of an energy source that is renewable, always-on and large-capacity.

“Based on where we are, moving much faster, much bigger in the direction of using much more geothermal, frankly, is all good news,” Wagner says.

To go faster and deeper will require advances in drilling technologies.

Companies are developing drilling equipment that is more stable when breaking through hard rock at high temperatures.

Some firms are even aiming to penetrate rock without using standard drills.

Quaise, a company with roots at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), is using a technology called millimetre wave drilling. The frequency is similar to that of microwaves.

Quaise’s application involves “sending electromagnetic waves in the microwave millimetre wave spectrum to essentially melt and vaporise through the rock,” explains Harry Kelso, Quaise’s communications manager.

Traditional geothermal energy clusters around hotspots on the earth’s surface where very hot rocks can be easily accessed.

“Millimetre wave drilling really enables you to access super-hot geothermal just about anywhere in the world,” says Kelso.

While Quaise is planning to use some conventional drilling at the project site it’s developing in Oregon, Kelso says that conventional drills start to break down more quickly when it reaches very hard rock.

Replacing drill bits increases the cost and time of drilling.

In Quaise’s case, Kelso says, “millimetre wave drilling is really what changes that because we’re not using a physical drill bit.”

Other companies are also working on advanced drilling technology, such as projectiles that move several times faster than the speed of sound.

Another crucial resource in the process is water. While some types of next-generation geothermal could create risks of water contamination or overconsumption, careful design can avoid this problem.

Initially Quaise’s system requires a lot of water, but according to Kelso, once the water is in the system it is continually circulated over the super-hot rocks.

“We’re essentially just recycling the water over and over,” he says.

Quaise is continuing to raise funds, with the aim of its Oregon project being up and running by 2030.

Like other early versions of geothermal systems, it’s an expensive project to get up and running.

“The economics are somewhat challenging,” Kelso admits. “Geothermal today is still more expensive because you are not getting as much power out of the well as you would if you were using that well for fossil fuel.”

But Quaise hopes that by targeting very high temperatures, of between 300C and 500C, the economics will improve.

While the higher end of that temperature range is ambitious, it’s a case of the-hotter-the-better.

“It allows you to get 10 times more energy per well from geothermal, which changes the economics and the power potential of geothermal,” according to Kelso.

In May, the Texas company Fervo Energy generated huge interest by becoming the first next-generation geothermal company to become publicly traded. It was initially valued at around $7.7bn.

Fervo anticipates that geothermal power from its Utah plant will cost roughly $7,000 per kilowatt of electricity. This is more than four times as expensive as solar and wind power.

But even at that premium, there are buyers for electricity from geothermal plants.

Fervo has an agreement to sell its energy to Google, which needs vast amounts of electricity of its new datacentres.

Fervo is also backed by Breakthrough Energy, a venture by Microsoft founder Bill Gates , externalto accelerate innovative electricity production.

Such investment is badly needed for next-gen geothermal firms, which have enormous capital costs. Datacentre projects alone won’t be enough to move the needle, according to the International Energy Agency.

Both customer demand and costs remain uncertain. The climate solutions organisation Project Drawdown, external notes that “early projects carry a significant risk of cost overruns”.

Nevertheless Columbia researcher Wagner believes geothermal has tremendous potential and is not just hype.

He emphasises that commodities like oil, gas and coal are vulnerable to political disruption, but “geothermal is a technology” and more secure.

Wagner is confident that geothermal energy has now achieved liftoff, and will only get better and cheaper over time.