Airtable gets into the AI agent game with Superagent

It might sound crazy to some, launching an entirely new product line while your flagship business has shed two-thirds of its paper value. But Howie Liu, the founder and CEO of Airtable, suggests it’s the sanest thing he could do.

The company that investors valued at $11.7 billion during the zero-interest-rate fervor of 2021 now trades on secondary markets at roughly $4 billion. But Airtable has raised $1.4 billion total, and Liu says the company still has half of that in the bank while “throwing off cash.” The valuation collapse affected investor returns and employee stock options, but didn’t undermine the business itself.

Liu’s response is to launch Superagent, an AI agent he suggests could eventually eclipse Airtable itself. It’s Airtable’s first standalone product in its 13-year history, and captures both where the company is headed and the reality of the current AI moment: every serious software player is racing to prove they can deliver on agents.

To understand what makes this move especially interesting, consider what Airtable is: a no-code platform that democratizes app-building. It’s essentially a supercharged database that lets anyone create custom software tailored to their workflows. The company now employs more than 700 people and serves over 500,000 organizations, including 80% of the Fortune 100. This isn’t a struggling startup but instead a mature business betting its future on a new architecture.

Superagent represents Liu’s bet on “multi-agent coordination”—a system where you ask a question and get not one AI assistant fumbling through sequential tasks, but a coordinating agent that deploys specialists working in parallel. “You’re not prompting an AI,” Liu explains. “You’re orchestrating a team.”

Here’s how it works: When you ask Superagent about expanding your athleisure brand into Europe (an example from Liu), the system first builds a research plan, identifying what needs investigation and surfacing dimensions you didn’t think to ask about. Then it deploys specialized agents in parallel – one investigating financials, another analyzing competitive positioning, another reviewing management and news. Finally, it synthesizes everything into a finished deliverable.

The output isn’t a wall of text. It’s an interactive market analysis with demographic breakdowns, competitive presence mapped visually, and expansion timelines you can filter and explore. “What if every person could have New York Times-quality data visualization built for every task they have,” Liu told me over Zoom last week. “This would have been unfathomable ten years ago, or five years ago, where you don’t get that quality of output – you just get text. But to be able to now get truly extremely high quality, rich interactive outputs as a default format, I think that’s a game changer.”

The distinction Liu draws between Superagent and competitors is technical. He name-checks Anthropic’s AI agent Claude and Manus (a newer entrant in the AI research space that’s being acquired by Meta) as the only two products with “a true, generally capable, long-running and really smart agent architecture.” Most other so-called agents, he argues, are merely “LLM powered workflows” – predetermined steps with AI calls mixed in, not true autonomous agents that can course-correct and backtrack.

It’s a fine line in a market where everyone is suddenly launching AI agents. OpenAI kicked off 2025 by launching new agent-building tools, while Notion, Harvey, and hundreds of other companies have since added agent functionality. In a market steeped with agent claims, Liu’s insistence that Superagent is different will need to prove itself in practice.

In a blog post announcing the product, Liu provides examples of what Superagent can do. Ask it to evaluate Google as a three-year investment opportunity, he writes, and you get a structured assessment with citations to earnings calls, defensibility analysis against OpenAI and Anthropic, and risk factors you hadn’t considered. Ask it to brief you on Wells Fargo’s AI strategy before pitching them, and you get their regulatory posture, recent AI investments, and specific pain points your product addresses. The system pulls from premium data sources like FactSet, Crunchbase, SEC filings, and earnings transcripts.

The move caps a transformation for Airtable, which Liu has been repositioning as an “AI-native platform.” Last fall, the company brought in David Azose, formerly the engineering lead for ChatGPT’s business products at OpenAI, as CTO. At the same time, it acquired DeepSky (formerly Gradient), an AI agents startup that had raised $40 million. Superagent will operate semi-independently from Airtable, helmed by DeepSky’s founding trio.

The pricing was still being hammered out as of last week, but it sounded poised to follow the emerging AI products playbook: $20 per month per user at the entry tier, up to $200 for power users, with generous inference credits. “We’re not trying to optimize for profit margin right now,” Liu says.

Whether Superagent becomes the trillion-dollar market Liu envisions or a big bet that doesn’t pan out remains to be seen. The competition is not trivial, and the distinctions Liu draws between “real agents” and the rest may not matter to customers if the others can deliver adequate results faster and cheaper.

But for a CEO whose company has lost $7.7 billion in paper valuation while retaining most of its actual capital, the move shows a willingness to bet on the future rather than protect the present. Indeed, Liu has reframed that earlier valuation compression as a recruiting advantage, telling employees they’re getting “equity that’s actually much more attractively priced than the $11 billion valuation” with significant upside if his bets pay off. He has capital for strategic acquisitions and doesn’t need to raise another round.

Asked if he thinks Superagent is ultimately the bigger opportunity, Liu shrugs — he’s not ruling it out. Airtable “will probably be larger for at least the near term than any new products that we do, including Superagent,” he says. “But I also like being able to bet on Superagent. Optionality is a good thing.”

This is Liu’s version of what he calls “wartime” leadership – a term he admits he once eschewed as needlessly violent but now embraces as apt. “Being very fast on the draw to be able to adapt,” he says, is “the most value-creative way to run things right now.” He quickly adds, “It’s also the most exciting way to do things.”