The Home Office is attempting to use three more military sites to house thousands of asylum seekers, as the government seeks to move people out of hotels.

Three Ministry of Defence (MoD) sites in Bicester in Oxfordshire, Barnham in Suffolk, and Linton-on-Ouse in North Yorkshire, could house about 3,750 asylum seekers if planning permission is granted.

The government is also looking to extend the use of existing military sites in Crowborough, East Sussex until 2030 and Wethersfield, Essex beyond 2027.

Labour has pledged to stop using asylum hotels, a costly form of accommodation that has become a focal point for anti-migrant protests.

As of March this year, 20,885 (21%) asylum seekers were in hotels and 72,768 (75%) were in other accommodation as they awaited decisions.

The number of asylum seekers in hotels has dropped from a peak of 56,000 in September 2023.

On Thursday, the Home Office said a further 20 asylum hotels had been shut, reducing the number in use to 170.

Border security and asylum minister Alex Norris said: “We are moving asylum seekers into ex-military sites that are a far cry from the hotels the last government left us with.

“This is a system being brought back under control – and we will not stop until the job is done.”

But Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said Labour “should be putting illegal immigrants on a plane home rather than messing around with military camps and hotels”.

He said Labour “will not do what is needed to tear down the barriers to deportation, and without deportation, there is no deterrent”.

The government stated its intention to increase the number of MoD sites it was using to accommodate asylum seekers last year.

Two former military sites – RAF Wethersfield in Essex, and Crowborough Training Camp in East Sussex – are already being used to house asylum seekers.

But the use of military sites for this purpose has been hampered by practical difficulties and highly contested by local residents as well as human rights groups.

This week, an MP said one scheme to house up to 300 male asylum seekers at Cameron Barracks in Inverness had been dropped, following protests.

The Red Cross said military barracks “are often in isolated locations and, by their very nature, can retraumatise people who have fled conflict and persecution”.

“It’s clear that housing people seeking asylum in hotels isn’t working well for anyone, but any alternative accommodation must enable people to live in safety and dignity,” said Sam Turner, British Red Cross director of migration and displacement, said.

The move to use more military sites comes ahead of immigration reforms expected to be introduced in Parliament next week.

The Immigration and Asylum Bill, which will aim to increase the forced removal of people refused asylum, is expected to be put before the House of Commons next Tuesday and is likely to face stiff opposition from some Labour MPs.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood will seek to drive through the reforms, which will be inherited by the next prime minister, following the resignation of Sir Keir Starmer.

Last month Andy Burnham, who is widely expected to become the Labour leader and prime minister, told the BBC he “supports the broad thrust” of what Mahmood is proposing.

The use of hotels to accommodate asylum seekers increased dramatically in 2020, driven by a backlog in processing asylum claims and a lack of long-term housing.

Their use has proved controversial, triggering protests in local communities and legal challenges from councils, as well as concerns over the cost.

In 2024-2025, £2.1bn was spent on hotels and the previous year the figure stood at £3bn – or £8.3m per day.

The Home Office said the following hotels had now closed to asylum seekers:

The majority of asylum seekers living in hotels entered the country after crossing the English Channel on small boats.

Labour promised to reduce the numbers of people crossing the Channel on small boats by smashing trafficking gangs however, numbers have remained high, with 41,472 arriving in 2025.