Steve Clarke said he was a “different” man.

After an underwhelming European Championships, the Scotland head coach hoped the nation’s tournament showing on the world stage would be different too.

But his side are on the brink of heading home at the first hurdle, in a similar fashion to their previous two finals appearances – with a whimper and without playing a historic knockout tie.

Scoring just once in three group fixtures, poor attacking output has again been symptomatic of what will likely be another failed attempt to progress from the group stage.

Here, BBC Scotland crunches the numbers behind that and looks at the potential deeper issues.

Scotland went to Euro 2024 hoping to make history and ended up creating records for all the wrong reasons.

Across their three matches, they had 17 shots. Since the Euros group stage was introduced in 1980, that is the joint-fewest by any nation.

Attacking numbers at the 2026 World Cup have also been sobering amid a summer of Tartan Army partying across Boston and Miami.

Data will adjust as more nations play their final group matches, but as it stands, no team has scored fewer goals per match than Scotland.

They are level at the foot of that chart with World Cup debutants Curacao, who sit 41 places below the Scots in the global rankings.

Clarke’s side’s expected goals tally is middle-of-the-road but has been underperformed by 1.6. They also rank level with Curacao and Haiti for shots on target per game – only eight of the 48 nations at the finals have a lower average.

After John McGinn scored against Haiti on matchday one, Clarke’s side went 200 minutes before they managed another shot on target, which came via a Scott McTominay header in the 49th minute against Brazil.

It is difficult to imagine what a Scotland goal looks like, especially with the talismanic McTominay enduring a challenging World Cup.

In an ultimately successful qualifying campaign, which culminated in one of the greatest Scotland matches of all time – an astonishing 4-2 win over Denmark – their route to goal regularly came from moments or dead-ball situations.

Many have felt this side are a moments team for quite some time now, and what moments they have provided during the nation’s most successful period in a generation.

However, there has always been a feeling that unconvincing performances in qualifying would eventually mean the moments would eventually run out. That has somewhat proved to be the case.

Much of the criticism that stemmed from Scotland’s meek Euro 2024 showings arose from Clarke’s reluctance to move away from a back-five formation.

This summer, that has not been the case. The Scotland boss has used three different set-ups across three different games.

A 4-4-2 shape that helped the Scots score eight goals across two encouraging World Cup warm-up fixtures against 10-man Curacao and Bolivia was deployed in the nervy win over the Haitians.

Slight variations of a 4-2-3-1 were used against both Morocco and Brazil, with full-back Kieran Tierney on the left of midfield against the former and a more attack-minded system, with Ben Gannon-Doak on the wing instead, against the Brazilians.

Morocco aside, the front-footed look of the Scotland XIs on paper against Haiti and Brazil played into the self-proclaimed idea that Clarke had travelled to the US as a new man with fresh ideas.

However, there were repeated concerns about gameplans and the execution of them.

Scotland were clinging on for much of the 1-0 victory over Haiti and many feared that a single-goal win would potentially be damaging for their hopes of progression. It looks set to play a part in what now feels like an inevitable early exit.

Clarke said the idea that his team should have beaten the Haitians more comfortably was a “narrative by people who don’t understand football”.

He also hailed the resolve of his side, but individual mistakes from his players cost them against Morocco and Brazil, two nations within Fifa’s world top 10.

Scotland’s defence failed to time their offside trap as the Moroccans took the lead in the second minute. And a hesitant Scott McKenna had his pocket picked within seven minutes against the Brazilians.

Those errors have prompted a debate about quality on the pitch and quality in the dugout. Are these players not at the required level, or is the instruction in and out of possession not clear enough?

It is a debate that will rumble on into the summer, with Scotland’s chances of knockout progression now rated at about 5%.

Qualification for three out of the past four tournaments is undoubtedly impressive given Scotland’s recent history, but fans still want progression.

While both of those things can be true, the key to that progress is yet to be found.