It is the eternal question facing women’s Test cricket: how do you improve at something that you hardly ever get the chance to do?

Before the start of every Test both captains are asked about how special it is to play the format and whether they would like to do so more often.

It is a tiring yet necessary ritual for both players and press, considering the scarcity of these matches.

And the answer is almost always the same: yes, we would love to play more Tests, but we’re not sure how the schedule allows it.

England’s one-off match against India, the first women’s Test to be played at Lord’s after 150 for the men, was a week of mixed emotions.

It was historic and emotional, its significance felt from the beginning of day one when past England players from the amateur era filled the pavilion and rang the bell five minutes before play to honour their contributions to the game’s position now.

There was also a record crowd for a women’s Test of 37,846 across the game.

But its timing also made it feel like an afterthought, plonked into the calendar between the Women’s T20 World Cup and The Hundred. It is indicative of the chaos of cricket’s schedule that this was probably still the least disruptive option.

England’s squad was unusual, with key players rested because of the focus on said World Cup, and they had only two or three days after the final to train with the red ball.

Since the multi-format Ashes was first introduced in 2013, most women’s Tests have been played as part of those series and worth a certain amount of points alongside white-ball games, but being a one-off Test left this one scrambling for relevance outside its historical context.

With the ever-growing influence of T20s, and an increasing gap in financial opportunities to fund the game professionally, where do women’s Tests fit in?

In the aftermath of the crushing 270-run defeat, England head coach Charlotte Edwards called for more women’s Tests as she often did when she was captain too, but highlighted the need for domestic red-call cricket.

India outplayed England in all departments across the four days, which could come down to a number of factors.

They had an extra week off after the T20 World Cup having not qualified for the semis, England had to digest the emotions of defeat in the final but, crucially, India’s domestic game does include some red-ball cricket.

Although their stars in this game such as Smriti Mandhana, Yastika Bhatia and Kranti Gaud did not play this year, it is a significant step in terms of the future of the game and how their next generation might fare coming through.

“I think there’s a place for it [women’s Tests] but maybe it has to be part of a multi series or a bilateral series. That’s something to look at moving forward,” Edwards told BBC Test Match Special.

“We’ve enjoyed Test cricket but you have to have it constantly, you can’t have it every 18 months. I’m a huge advocate for it, there’s so much you can learn from it. I think there’s so much that can be learned from three- and four-day cricket, it only helps other aspects of the game.

“I think we need to see it in Tier One cricket, getting that exposure for younger players, older players, it’s so important.”

The lack of preparation was evident in England’s performance as they were bowled out for 170 and 186 and averaged just four runs per dismissal against balls on the stumps throughout the Test.

The bowlers could also not bowl long spells consistently – again, of little surprise considering their diet of short-format cricket.

In theory, England’s next Test match is scheduled to be in the Caribbean next April but to highlight the financial mismatch of the global game, Australia’s Test against West Indies was dropped from the schedule earlier this year.

It would not be surprising if the same happened again and if it does, England will not play with the red ball until the home Ashes next summer.

There are currently 10 women’s Tests in the Future Tours Programme up until April 2029, all involving England, Australia, India, South Africa and West Indies. In contrast, the next 10 men’s Tests will be completed by the end of October.

In terms of crowds, England women have enjoyed a record-breaking summer with attendance records throughout the T20 World Cup and during the Lord’s Test, but both have been fighting against the football World Cup, men’s Tests and Wimbledon in the wider sporting world.

They were even competing directly against the men’s cricket side on Saturday, who played a T20 against India at 14:30 BST.

Then, on day three of the Test, mere hours after former captain Heather Knight’s retirement had made the headlines, the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) announced that men’s head coach Brendon McCullum had been sacked as Test coach.

“I just think it’s a bit of a shame,” former England spinner Alex Hartley told BBC Test Match Special on Sunday.

“The ECB say ‘we treat everything equally’ – but it’s taken too long for them to play here.

“Fifty years later, we’re playing in our first Test match and the headlines are completely taken away from it now.

“This game is done in the fact that England aren’t going to win, but there’s a Test match to save, it’s an historic moment within itself. There’s a [men’s] ODI series starting Tuesday, I completely understand that they want to get the news out before then, but I’m sorry, if you say that you respect the game and you want the game to improve then don’t just pay it lip service, actually prove it and say ‘we’ll hang on to this news until Tuesday morning’ or seven o’clock on Monday night.”

ECB chief executive Richard Gould told the BBC that there had been consideration about the announcement coming during the women’s Test and referenced an “extraordinary” T20 World Cup campaign where “the women’s game in England is stronger than it’s ever been”.

England’s players have little time to dwell on the Test defeat, much like with the World Cup, as they immediately turn their attention to The Hundred which starts on 21 July.

The ECB’s franchise tournament has played a huge part in the growth of women’s cricket in the country since its inception in 2021, attracting healthy crowds during the summer holidays and being played in double-headers alongside the men’s games.

And that is the reality, that short-format cricket is the money-maker in the women’s game. The disparity between India, Australia, England and the rest in terms of finances makes it understandable to see why those other boards would want to host Test cricket at such a big financial loss.

“My opinion is that you’ll see fewer countries playing Test cricket, but the quality and the jeopardy of those Test matches will be more,” Todd Greenberg, CEO of Cricket Australia, told BBC Sport.

“We have to get comfortable with that. Women’s cricket has got the greatest opportunity to transform the game and to bring new people in to watch it – we saw that recently with the World Cup.

“I’d be less focused on them playing Test cricket and for them to play the format that generates the most eyeballs, the most commercial returns so we can put that back into the game.”

Additional reporting by Timothy Abraham.