British and European officials will discuss the future options for the UK’s relationship with the EU, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has told the BBC.

Officials on both sides are expected to begin discussions about a range of options, including free movement, before the EU summit on 20 November.

However, Downing Street has insisted the government’s current focus is on achieving new deals in areas such as food and youth mobility at the summit.

Reynolds said no “assumptions” had been made about what the UK’s future relationship with Brussels could look like.

Andy Burnham has said he wants an “honest discussion” about the prospect of returning to free movement between the UK and EU.

But the prime minister has been clear any major changes to the UK-EU relationship would require a mandate at a general election, which is due by 2029.

He has vowed to stick by the red lines in Labour’s 2024 manifesto, with no return to freedom of movement, the EU single market or customs union, for the duration of this parliamentary session, which will end by 2029.

Freedom of movement, which allows EU citizens to travel, live, study and work in any member country, is a precondition of membership of the EU’s single market.

The single market enables goods, services and people to move freely between member states, with countries also applying many common rules and standards.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Reynolds said current discussions ahead of the summit are around food and drink, electricity and emissions trading.

He said: “What the prime minister has also said, quite rightly, is we face a series of policy changes on the European side that will affect us.

“We need to get as little uncertainty as possible, we need to have a way to resolve what our long-term relationship will be and he is going to set that out after the summit.

“He is going to be frank with the British people about what the trade-offs are but no assumptions have been made on that.”

Pressed on whether UK officials are talking to the EU about freedom of movement Reynolds said: “They will be talking to them about what the future options for our relationship might be.

“But here and now, the focus should be on the summit and the tangible difference improvements we’re going to make.”

A government spokesperson stressed there were no current discussions on freedom of movement.

“We are working with the EU on the areas set out and agreed ahead of the UK-EU Summit and within the manifesto red lines,” the spokesperson added.

Burnham is far more willing to have a public conversation around Brexit than his predecessor Sir Keir Starmer, whose government was nervous about reopening a debate that proved so contentious in the past.

Some people within the Labour Party had been urging Sir Keir to go further and there is a widely held view that Burnham’s comments are likely to go down well with voters tempted by the Liberal Democrats and Greens.

But there is nervousness among Labour MPs with small majorities in Brexit-supporting, Reform-facing constituencies.

Labour MP Melanie Onn, whose constituency Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes backed leaving the EU, told the Today programme Burnham risked losing trust by talking about going beyond the 2024 manifesto at a future election.

“I don’t think that the scars have healed for many people around the country so I do think this is an unnecessary conversation to be having at this time,” she said.

Onn, who lost her seat in 2019 to the Conservatives but won it back in 2024, warned against re-opening the conversation, saying: “Trust is incredibly important, it’s hard-earned and easily lost, and on this matter I think that we should tread incredibly carefully.”

Speaking to BBC Wales, Labour MP Ruth Jones said: “We need to be very careful here. We must respect the Brexit referendum result.”

Asked if a referendum on freedom of movement was something she would support, the MP for Newport West and Islwyn said: “We’re a long way from that. Andy Burnham is floating the idea, and it’s great to float ideas, but let’s talk it through and see what does it mean, because another referendum at this particular time would be divisive.”

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage told BBC Breakfast that “Andy Burnham has no mandate to be in Brussels, to be negotiating any of this” and called for the prime minister to put his ideas to the public in a general election.

On Monday, Burnham left the door open to a potential referendum on freedom of movement with the EU.

The prime minister caused some confusion when he told broadcasters that he would not reintroduce free movement without a referendum, but Downing Street later said no decisions had been made on whether a public vote would be needed.

Housing Secretary Angela Rayner told the BBC on Sunday that no options for the UK’s future relationship could be taken off the table.

But Burnham did appear to draw some red lines of his own when he told the Sunday Times, external that he would not be in favour of the UK joining the euro or the border-free Schengen zone.

The fact the prime minister has not been willing to say the same thing about free movement is being seen in Westminster as evidence that he believes it is a genuine option.

Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It’ll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.